Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) Report Analysis
According to their recent financial report, which was published on 2022-05-10, Monolithic Power Systems had several impressive financial metrics that should make them more attractive than their peers going forward. Their income and value factors performance indicate that company management is focused on the right targets and executing well. We expect that this positive performance will continue in the coming months, and anticipate that Monolithic Power Systems will maintain good momentum even in a challenging environment. Therefore, they earned a total score of 83 out of 100 and a BUY recommendation.
Monolithic Power Systems reported earnings results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2022. For the first quarter, the company reported sales was USD 377.71 million compared to USD 254.46 million a year ago. Net income was USD 79.57 million compared to USD 45.41 million a year ago. Basic earnings per share from continuing operations was USD 1.71 compared to USD 1 a year ago. Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations was USD 1.65 compared to USD 0.95 a year ago.
Business Description
Monolithic Power Systems engages in the design, development, marketing, and sale of semiconductor-based power electronics solutions for the computing and storage, automotive, industrial, communications, and consumer markets. The company provides direct current (DC) to DC integrated circuits (ICs) that are used to convert and control voltages of various electronic systems, such as portable electronic devices, wireless LAN access points, computers and notebooks, monitors, infotainment applications, and medical equipment. It also offers lighting control ICs for backlighting that are used in systems, which provide the light source for LCD panels in notebook computers, monitors, car navigation systems, and televisions, as well as for general illumination products. The company sells its products through third-party distributors and value-added resellers, as well as directly to original equipment manufacturers, original design manufacturers, electronic manufacturing service providers, and other end customers in China, Taiwan, Europe, South Korea, Southeast Asia, Japan, the United States, and internationally. Monolithic Power Systems was incorporated in 1997 and is headquartered in Kirkland, Washington.
Sector Overview
Monolithic Power Systems is included in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment according to GICS (global industry classification standard). The Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry is part of the Information Technology sector. It includes manufacturers of semiconductors, semiconductor equipment, and related products. Monolithic Power Systems's industry and sector affiliation are expected to negatively affect their likelihood to overperform the market in the upcoming period, as other sectors appear more likely to benefit from the macroeconomic environment we see now.
Parameter | Value | Change | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Return on Equity | 23.5 | 7.4% | 83 | |
Net Cashflow | 42.2 | 129.0% | 84 | |
Capital Expenditure | -102.3 | -8.4% | 59 | |
Asset Turnover | 0.9 | 1.9% | 74 | |
Free Cashflow | 5.4 | 9.4% | 78 |
* All values are TTM
The below chart reflects Monolithic Power Systems's birds-eye view on its performance with respect to its peers, the company's fillings as reported or to a similar industry, market cap, and country of origin. While Monolithic Power Systems's peer average final assessment score stands on 70.0, Monolithic Power Systems's score is 83.
When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Monolithic Power Systems's stock is now priced below its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (moving average convergence divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a negative setup in the near, medium, and long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (relative strength index), Monolithic Power Systems's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators signal negative momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (technical analysis) score of 37.
Cash & Equivalents and Liabilities stood out as the most significant drivers of Monolithic Power Systems's balance sheet strength. Monolithic Power Systems's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 260.6. This represents 37.7% change from the last reporting period. Its impressive cash and cash equivalents metrics should support upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 92. Also, Monolithic Power Systems is doing a good job of keeping its liabilities under control and growing intelligently. At filing, their liabilities were 387.9, representing 13.5% change from the previous period. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. These results statistically lead to positive movement in stock prices, so we rated its liabilities movement component 85. That said, one metric, Assets, stood out as strongly negative. Monolithic Power Systems assets metrics were reported as 1714.0, representing a 8.1% change from the last filing. Monolithic Power Systems's unremarkable asset growth results, specifically compared to their industry peers' performance, should present negative pressure on Monolithic Power Systems's stock price. Its asset component, therefore, received a grade of 64. Therefore, it received a score of 84.
Parameter | Value | Change | Score |
---|---|---|---|
Assets | 1,714.0 | 8.1% | 64 |
Liabilities | 387.9 | 13.5% | 85 |
Price to Book | 14.0 | -23.6% | 80 |
Cash & Equivalents | 260.6 | 37.7% | 92 |
Equity | 1,326.1 | 6.6% | 76 |
The below chart describes Monolithic Power Systems's performance as reflected on its balance sheet with respect to its peers. While Monolithic Power Systems received a balance sheet score of 84, the average of its peers stands on 72.0.
Name | Market Cap | Liabilities Movement | Asset Change | Equity/Intangibles Adjustments | Cash & Equivalents | Book Value Momentum | Balance Sheet | mc_sort | Hidden |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA Corporation | 400.2B | 78 | 70 | 65 | 97 | 54 | 71 | 0 | 1 |
Intel Corporation | 154.5B | 65 | 69 | 76 | 90 | 81 | 77 | 1 | 1 |
QUALCOMM Incorporated | 147.4B | 57 | 71 | 96 | 80 | 80 | 82 | 2 | 1 |
Texas Instruments Incorporated | 142.2B | 63 | 69 | 87 | 46 | 84 | 76 | 3 | 1 |
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 130.9B | 93 | 61 | 78 | 96 | 80 | 88 | 4 | 1 |
Broadcom Inc. | 102.5B | 67 | 79 | 58 | 56 | 55 | 62 | 5 | 1 |
Applied Materials, Inc. | 82.7B | 71 | 72 | 63 | 41 | 55 | 60 | 6 | 1 |
Analog Devices, Inc. | 77.2B | 62 | 80 | 66 | 66 | 66 | 69 | 7 | 1 |
Micron Technology, Inc. | 64.6B | 73 | 69 | 85 | 76 | 74 | 81 | 8 | 1 |
Lam Research Corporation | 60.8B | 72 | 77 | 58 | 51 | 45 | 60 | 9 | 1 |
KLA Corporation | 49.3B | 75 | 62 | 73 | 53 | 66 | 66 | 10 | 1 |
NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 40.5B | 71 | 68 | 56 | 62 | 76 | 64 | 11 | 1 |
Marvell Technology, Inc. | 38.5B | 71 | 84 | 50 | 46 | 51 | 60 | 12 | 1 |
Microchip Technology Incorporated | 33.0B | 65 | 84 | 76 | 72 | 66 | 79 | 13 | 1 |
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 23.9B | 81 | 65 | 74 | 82 | 74 | 78 | 14 | 1 |
ON Semiconductor Corporation | 22.9B | 74 | 68 | 77 | 89 | 82 | 81 | 15 | 1 |
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 15.5B | 69 | 77 | 63 | 46 | 52 | 62 | 16 | 1 |
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. | 15.5B | 77 | 62 | 78 | 96 | 85 | 81 | 17 | 1 |
Teradyne, Inc. | 15.3B | 49 | 81 | 62 | 45 | 47 | 52 | 18 | 1 |
Entegris, Inc. | 14.1B | 62 | 70 | 75 | 55 | 78 | 70 | 19 | 1 |
Qorvo, Inc. | 10.2B | 64 | 83 | 64 | 67 | 55 | 67 | 20 | 1 |
First Solar, Inc. | 7.2B | 76 | 70 | 50 | 58 | 58 | 59 | 21 | 1 |
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 6.8B | 53 | 79 | 78 | 60 | 64 | 68 | 22 | 1 |
MKS Instruments, Inc. | 5.8B | 60 | 73 | 73 | 76 | 72 | 70 | 23 | 1 |
Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 5.3B | 89 | 81 | 59 | 45 | 48 | 72 | 24 | 1 |
Universal Display Corporation | 5.2B | 57 | 76 | 83 | 85 | 69 | 75 | 25 | 1 |
CMC Materials, Inc. | 5.1B | 65 | 78 | 73 | 87 | 82 | 81 | 26 | 1 |
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. | 5.1B | 68 | 72 | 69 | 61 | 58 | 65 | 27 | 1 |
Synaptics Incorporated | 4.9B | 71 | 71 | 79 | 92 | 76 | 81 | 28 | 1 |
Power Integrations, Inc. | 4.4B | 56 | 82 | 58 | 79 | 53 | 61 | 29 | 1 |
Amkor Technology, Inc. | 4.2B | 70 | 68 | 75 | 74 | 77 | 75 | 30 | 1 |
Cirrus Logic, Inc. | 4.1B | 73 | 76 | 81 | 96 | 73 | 86 | 31 | 1 |
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 4.0B | 68 | 69 | 74 | 81 | 76 | 74 | 32 | 1 |
Semtech Corporation | 3.5B | 58 | 79 | 68 | 67 | 64 | 67 | 33 | 1 |
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 3.3B | 65 | 75 | 74 | 38 | 74 | 70 | 34 | 1 |
FormFactor, Inc. | 3.1B | 72 | 70 | 84 | 82 | 80 | 84 | 35 | 1 |
Diodes Incorporated | 3.0B | 47 | 78 | 71 | 51 | 71 | 62 | 36 | 1 |
SunPower Corporation | 3.0B | 72 | 81 | 42 | 83 | 54 | 61 | 37 | 1 |
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 2.8B | 40 | 85 | 60 | 40 | 48 | 54 | 38 | 1 |
MaxLinear, Inc. | 2.7B | 68 | 71 | 75 | 85 | 74 | 76 | 39 | 1 |
Nova Ltd. | 2.7B | 86 | 45 | 75 | 48 | 82 | 61 | 40 | 1 |
Ambarella, Inc. | 2.6B | 46 | 75 | 74 | 86 | 65 | 64 | 41 | 1 |
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 2.6B | 46 | 83 | 60 | 76 | 56 | 58 | 42 | 1 |
Rambus Inc. | 2.4B | 43 | 83 | 41 | 95 | 54 | 48 | 43 | 1 |
Canadian Solar Inc. | 2.0B | 91 | 54 | 59 | 62 | 62 | 59 | 44 | 1 |
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | 1.9B | 76 | 68 | 84 | 71 | 73 | 81 | 45 | 1 |
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 1.7B | 94 | 61 | 78 | 79 | 86 | 88 | 46 | 1 |
Himax Technologies, Inc. | 1.6B | 78 | 55 | 91 | 85 | 95 | 77 | 47 | 1 |
Impinj, Inc. | 1.4B | 63 | 68 | 79 | 39 | 92 | 72 | 48 | 1 |
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. | 1.4B | 56 | 78 | 69 | 48 | 67 | 63 | 49 | 1 |
Cohu, Inc. | 1.3B | 53 | 82 | 57 | 59 | 58 | 58 | 50 | 1 |
Photronics, Inc. | 1.2B | 53 | 85 | 66 | 76 | 66 | 69 | 51 | 1 |
SMART Global Holdings, Inc. | 1.0B | 89 | 63 | 75 | 95 | 82 | 86 | 52 | 1 |
Veeco Instruments Inc. | 1.0B | 84 | 71 | 41 | 78 | 47 | 58 | 53 | 1 |
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited | 929.5M | 89 | 63 | 68 | 87 | 67 | 77 | 54 | 1 |
PDF Solutions, Inc. | 808.6M | 54 | 81 | 63 | 90 | 51 | 63 | 55 | 1 |
CEVA, Inc. | 778.5M | 81 | 74 | 60 | 87 | 60 | 73 | 56 | 1 |
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. | 754.1M | 59 | 76 | 66 | 38 | 63 | 60 | 57 | 1 |
Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. | 575.9M | 87 | 68 | 40 | 78 | 38 | 53 | 58 | 1 |
Enphase Energy, Inc. | 25.7B | 89 | 60 | 39 | 97 | 56 | 58 | 59 | 1 |
Wolfspeed, Inc. | 8.2B | 96 | 63 | 59 | 97 | 55 | 74 | 60 | 1 |
Daqo New Energy Corp. | 5.0B | 91 | 62 | 81 | 95 | 93 | 93 | 61 | 1 |
SiTime Corporation | 3.6B | 57 | 67 | 66 | 73 | 64 | 59 | 62 | 1 |
Onto Innovation Inc. | 3.6B | 83 | 70 | 67 | 72 | 73 | 78 | 63 | 1 |
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. | 3.2B | 86 | 62 | 77 | 94 | 94 | 89 | 64 | 1 |
Camtek Ltd. | 1.1B | 63 | 61 | 82 | 37 | 90 | 66 | 65 | 1 |
ACM Research, Inc. | 917.6M | 87 | 57 | 51 | 43 | 50 | 52 | 66 | 1 |
NeoPhotonics Corporation | 838.5M | 89 | 66 | 49 | 72 | 64 | 66 | 67 | 1 |
Hanwha Q CELLS Co., Ltd. | 818.9M | 60 | 93 | 47 | 85 | 74 | 72 | 68 | 1 |
indie Semiconductor, Inc. | 720.1M | 48 | 54 | 72 | 56 | 55 | 44 | 69 | 1 |
Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation | 667.1M | 56 | 78 | 79 | 72 | 72 | 74 | 70 | 1 |
Mykrolis Corp. | 657.1M | 77 | 53 | 73 | 92 | 79 | 72 | 71 | 1 |
Navitas Semiconductor Corporation | 533.1M | 37 | 80 | 80 | 62 | 79 | 67 | 72 | 1 |
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. | 417.9M | 60 | 71 | 61 | 60 | 69 | 56 | 73 | 1 |
Rigetti Computing, Inc. | 413.5M | 93 | 62 | 85 | 99 | 98 | 98 | 74 | 1 |
Meta Materials Inc. | 396.9M | 51 | 78 | 42 | 41 | 51 | 42 | 75 | 1 |
Helix Technology Corporation | 364.9M | 65 | 78 | 79 | 85 | 52 | 65 | 76 | 1 |
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. | 357.2M | 92 | 70 | 66 | 45 | 72 | 75 | 77 | 1 |
Rockley Photonics Holdings Limited | 305.7M | 49 | 82 | 40 | 37 | 52 | 42 | 78 | 1 |
CyberOptics Corporation | 272.8M | 71 | 66 | 72 | 64 | 86 | 75 | 79 | 1 |
Transphorm, Inc. | 255.8M | 41 | 86 | 39 | 47 | 54 | 45 | 80 | 1 |
Overall, Monolithic Power Systems's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. Monolithic Power Systems's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 354.5, which represents a 18.0% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 13.2%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 90. Also, Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Monolithic Power Systems reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 23.5, representing a change of 7.4% from the last report. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 83. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. Monolithic Power Systems reported discouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. As of the current filing, they were reported as 1331.1 and represented 10.2% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 18.5 percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency does not make a compelling case for upward pressure on the company's stock price. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 45. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 66.
Parameter | Value | Change | Score |
---|---|---|---|
EBITDA | 354.5 | 18.0% | 90 |
Total Revenues | 1,331.1 | 10.2% | 45 |
Return on Equity | 23.5 | 7.4% | 83 |
The below chart describes Monolithic Power Systems's performance as reflected on its income statement with respect to its peers. While Monolithic Power Systems received a income statement score of 66 , the average of its peers stands on 66.0.
Name | Market Cap | Revenue Momentum | Earning Movement | Return Factors Momentum | Income Statement | mc_sort | Hidden |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA Corporation | 400.2B | 46 | 83 | 67 | 63 | 0 | 1 |
Intel Corporation | 154.5B | 90 | 55 | 74 | 76 | 1 | 1 |
QUALCOMM Incorporated | 147.4B | 48 | 87 | 78 | 66 | 2 | 1 |
Texas Instruments Incorporated | 142.2B | 69 | 78 | 70 | 74 | 3 | 1 |
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 130.9B | 40 | 89 | 38 | 59 | 4 | 1 |
Broadcom Inc. | 102.5B | 59 | 80 | 90 | 71 | 5 | 1 |
Applied Materials, Inc. | 82.7B | 72 | 68 | 73 | 72 | 6 | 1 |
Analog Devices, Inc. | 77.2B | 40 | 91 | 92 | 65 | 7 | 1 |
Micron Technology, Inc. | 64.6B | 59 | 87 | 90 | 74 | 8 | 1 |
Lam Research Corporation | 60.8B | 80 | 64 | 75 | 74 | 9 | 1 |
KLA Corporation | 49.3B | 56 | 77 | 76 | 67 | 10 | 1 |
NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 40.5B | 59 | 79 | 90 | 71 | 11 | 1 |
Marvell Technology, Inc. | 38.5B | 41 | 89 | 87 | 64 | 12 | 1 |
Microchip Technology Incorporated | 33.0B | 57 | 83 | 92 | 71 | 13 | 1 |
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 23.9B | 50 | 92 | 86 | 70 | 14 | 1 |
ON Semiconductor Corporation | 22.9B | 53 | 92 | 94 | 73 | 15 | 1 |
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 15.5B | 69 | 71 | 63 | 70 | 16 | 1 |
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. | 15.5B | 41 | 70 | 48 | 53 | 17 | 1 |
Teradyne, Inc. | 15.3B | 88 | 57 | 62 | 75 | 18 | 1 |
Entegris, Inc. | 14.1B | 56 | 80 | 80 | 69 | 19 | 1 |
Qorvo, Inc. | 10.2B | 76 | 65 | 63 | 72 | 20 | 1 |
First Solar, Inc. | 7.2B | 98 | 43 | 40 | 73 | 21 | 1 |
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 6.8B | 54 | 88 | 89 | 71 | 22 | 1 |
MKS Instruments, Inc. | 5.8B | 78 | 67 | 65 | 74 | 23 | 1 |
Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 5.3B | 44 | 96 | 98 | 70 | 24 | 1 |
Universal Display Corporation | 5.2B | 71 | 64 | 61 | 68 | 25 | 1 |
CMC Materials, Inc. | 5.1B | 72 | 75 | 93 | 76 | 26 | 1 |
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. | 5.1B | 63 | 87 | 82 | 79 | 27 | 1 |
Synaptics Incorporated | 4.9B | 45 | 91 | 90 | 68 | 28 | 1 |
Power Integrations, Inc. | 4.4B | 80 | 76 | 82 | 80 | 29 | 1 |
Amkor Technology, Inc. | 4.2B | 63 | 76 | 77 | 70 | 30 | 1 |
Cirrus Logic, Inc. | 4.1B | 42 | 92 | 93 | 67 | 31 | 1 |
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 4.0B | 68 | 48 | 69 | 61 | 32 | 1 |
Semtech Corporation | 3.5B | 64 | 84 | 87 | 75 | 33 | 1 |
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 3.3B | 74 | 77 | 72 | 76 | 34 | 1 |
FormFactor, Inc. | 3.1B | 79 | 76 | 83 | 80 | 35 | 1 |
Diodes Incorporated | 3.0B | 66 | 83 | 86 | 76 | 36 | 1 |
SunPower Corporation | 3.0B | 49 | 43 | 74 | 49 | 37 | 1 |
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 2.8B | 54 | 83 | 78 | 72 | 38 | 1 |
MaxLinear, Inc. | 2.7B | 56 | 92 | 96 | 75 | 39 | 1 |
Nova Ltd. | 2.7B | 41 | 89 | 78 | 69 | 40 | 1 |
Ambarella, Inc. | 2.6B | 56 | 89 | 79 | 72 | 41 | 1 |
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 2.6B | 73 | 82 | 85 | 79 | 42 | 1 |
Rambus Inc. | 2.4B | 48 | 86 | 60 | 64 | 43 | 1 |
Canadian Solar Inc. | 2.0B | 73 | 76 | 53 | 72 | 44 | 1 |
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | 1.9B | 44 | 91 | 91 | 67 | 45 | 1 |
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 1.7B | 38 | 88 | 61 | 60 | 46 | 1 |
Himax Technologies, Inc. | 1.6B | 53 | 84 | 66 | 70 | 47 | 1 |
Impinj, Inc. | 1.4B | 64 | 53 | 51 | 59 | 48 | 1 |
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. | 1.4B | 53 | 73 | 71 | 63 | 49 | 1 |
Cohu, Inc. | 1.3B | 92 | 53 | 49 | 75 | 50 | 1 |
Photronics, Inc. | 1.2B | 55 | 86 | 92 | 71 | 51 | 1 |
SMART Global Holdings, Inc. | 1.0B | 48 | 87 | 66 | 65 | 52 | 1 |
Veeco Instruments Inc. | 1.0B | 66 | 84 | 91 | 76 | 53 | 1 |
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited | 929.5M | 62 | 75 | 76 | 69 | 54 | 1 |
PDF Solutions, Inc. | 808.6M | 49 | 95 | 88 | 71 | 55 | 1 |
CEVA, Inc. | 778.5M | 51 | 90 | 97 | 71 | 56 | 1 |
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. | 754.1M | 72 | 60 | 54 | 67 | 57 | 1 |
Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. | 575.9M | 50 | 49 | 60 | 49 | 58 | 1 |
Enphase Energy, Inc. | 25.7B | 45 | 74 | 55 | 57 | 59 | 1 |
Wolfspeed, Inc. | 8.2B | 49 | 90 | 86 | 69 | 60 | 1 |
Daqo New Energy Corp. | 5.0B | 37 | 95 | 94 | 65 | 61 | 1 |
SiTime Corporation | 3.6B | 40 | 93 | 78 | 64 | 62 | 1 |
Onto Innovation Inc. | 3.6B | 47 | 87 | 89 | 67 | 63 | 1 |
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. | 3.2B | 38 | 89 | 82 | 62 | 64 | 1 |
Camtek Ltd. | 1.1B | 50 | 81 | 71 | 68 | 65 | 1 |
ACM Research, Inc. | 917.6M | 88 | 43 | 42 | 67 | 66 | 1 |
NeoPhotonics Corporation | 838.5M | 45 | 95 | 90 | 69 | 67 | 1 |
Hanwha Q CELLS Co., Ltd. | 818.9M | 90 | 59 | 63 | 70 | 68 | 1 |
indie Semiconductor, Inc. | 720.1M | 37 | 46 | 71 | 43 | 69 | 1 |
Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation | 667.1M | 94 | 80 | 88 | 90 | 70 | 1 |
Mykrolis Corp. | 657.1M | 68 | 68 | 58 | 67 | 71 | 1 |
Navitas Semiconductor Corporation | 533.1M | 56 | 44 | 74 | 53 | 72 | 1 |
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. | 417.9M | 87 | 49 | 76 | 66 | 73 | 1 |
Rigetti Computing, Inc. | 413.5M | 92 | 43 | 69 | 72 | 74 | 1 |
Meta Materials Inc. | 396.9M | 37 | 45 | 72 | 43 | 75 | 1 |
Helix Technology Corporation | 364.9M | 89 | 47 | 50 | 74 | 76 | 1 |
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. | 357.2M | 41 | 86 | 65 | 65 | 77 | 1 |
Rockley Photonics Holdings Limited | 305.7M | 97 | 50 | 85 | 79 | 78 | 1 |
CyberOptics Corporation | 272.8M | 54 | 86 | 87 | 71 | 79 | 1 |
Transphorm, Inc. | 255.8M | 37 | 81 | 97 | 68 | 80 | 1 |
Net Cash Flow and Free Cash flow stand out as the most significant drivers of Monolithic Power Systems's cash flow's strength. Monolithic Power Systems's strong net cash flow numbers, which were 42.2 in this filing, showed a 129.0% change from the last period. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 84. Also, Monolithic Power Systems did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 5.4, representing a 9.4% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 7.4%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 78. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Capital Expenditure, was notably weak. Monolithic Power Systems's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Monolithic Power Systems recorded CapEx of -102.3, which represents a -8.4% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 59. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 77.
Parameter | Value | Change | Score |
---|---|---|---|
Net Cashflow | 42.2 | 129.0% | 84 |
Capital Expenditure | -102.3 | -8.4% | 59 |
Asset Turnover | 0.9 | 1.9% | 74 |
Free Cashflow | 5.4 | 9.4% | 78 |
The below chart describes Monolithic Power Systems's performance as reflected on its cash flow with respect to its peers. While Monolithic Power Systems received a cash flow score of 77, the average of its peers stands on 69.0.
Name | Market Cap | Cashflow Momentum | Free Cashflow Growth | Capital Expenditure Growth | Assets Factors Momentum | Cash Flow | mc_sort | Hidden |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA Corporation | 400.2B | 93 | 65 | 61 | 86 | 82 | 0 | 1 |
Intel Corporation | 154.5B | 58 | 72 | 68 | 53 | 58 | 1 | 1 |
QUALCOMM Incorporated | 147.4B | 65 | 65 | 70 | 87 | 77 | 2 | 1 |
Texas Instruments Incorporated | 142.2B | 74 | 74 | 63 | 69 | 70 | 3 | 1 |
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 130.9B | 93 | 66 | 69 | 37 | 57 | 4 | 1 |
Broadcom Inc. | 102.5B | 75 | 76 | 87 | 89 | 85 | 5 | 1 |
Applied Materials, Inc. | 82.7B | 75 | 59 | 69 | 72 | 69 | 6 | 1 |
Analog Devices, Inc. | 77.2B | 78 | 76 | 51 | 94 | 84 | 7 | 1 |
Micron Technology, Inc. | 64.6B | 81 | 85 | 81 | 74 | 80 | 8 | 1 |
Lam Research Corporation | 60.8B | 72 | 60 | 56 | 75 | 69 | 9 | 1 |
KLA Corporation | 49.3B | 70 | 76 | 52 | 79 | 74 | 10 | 1 |
NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 40.5B | 59 | 72 | 51 | 85 | 73 | 11 | 1 |
Marvell Technology, Inc. | 38.5B | 94 | 84 | 58 | 46 | 65 | 12 | 1 |
Microchip Technology Incorporated | 33.0B | 80 | 79 | 48 | 84 | 79 | 13 | 1 |
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 23.9B | 54 | 86 | 45 | 64 | 63 | 14 | 1 |
ON Semiconductor Corporation | 22.9B | 60 | 79 | 55 | 74 | 70 | 15 | 1 |
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 15.5B | 78 | 57 | 79 | 73 | 71 | 16 | 1 |
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. | 15.5B | 46 | 38 | 55 | 52 | 43 | 17 | 1 |
Teradyne, Inc. | 15.3B | 75 | 65 | 66 | 68 | 68 | 18 | 1 |
Entegris, Inc. | 14.1B | 61 | 57 | 50 | 76 | 65 | 19 | 1 |
Qorvo, Inc. | 10.2B | 78 | 65 | 87 | 71 | 73 | 20 | 1 |
First Solar, Inc. | 7.2B | 47 | 85 | 56 | 46 | 53 | 21 | 1 |
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 6.8B | 79 | 77 | 43 | 82 | 77 | 22 | 1 |
MKS Instruments, Inc. | 5.8B | 58 | 58 | 92 | 56 | 59 | 23 | 1 |
Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 5.3B | 71 | 89 | 81 | 87 | 86 | 24 | 1 |
Universal Display Corporation | 5.2B | 75 | 81 | 68 | 65 | 71 | 25 | 1 |
CMC Materials, Inc. | 5.1B | 72 | 66 | 68 | 80 | 74 | 26 | 1 |
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. | 5.1B | 76 | 57 | 55 | 59 | 68 | 27 | 1 |
Synaptics Incorporated | 4.9B | 85 | 62 | 98 | 55 | 66 | 28 | 1 |
Power Integrations, Inc. | 4.4B | 88 | 77 | 64 | 82 | 82 | 29 | 1 |
Amkor Technology, Inc. | 4.2B | 46 | 57 | 62 | 71 | 60 | 30 | 1 |
Cirrus Logic, Inc. | 4.1B | 83 | 98 | 61 | 90 | 90 | 31 | 1 |
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 4.0B | 56 | 56 | 77 | 56 | 56 | 32 | 1 |
Semtech Corporation | 3.5B | 79 | 78 | 58 | 79 | 77 | 33 | 1 |
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 3.3B | 46 | 78 | 54 | 78 | 68 | 34 | 1 |
FormFactor, Inc. | 3.1B | 78 | 81 | 66 | 58 | 67 | 35 | 1 |
Diodes Incorporated | 3.0B | 77 | 61 | 52 | 80 | 72 | 36 | 1 |
SunPower Corporation | 3.0B | 84 | 41 | 39 | 93 | 74 | 37 | 1 |
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 2.8B | 63 | 53 | 46 | 85 | 61 | 38 | 1 |
MaxLinear, Inc. | 2.7B | 90 | 92 | 80 | 81 | 88 | 39 | 1 |
Nova Ltd. | 2.7B | 58 | 53 | 39 | 58 | 54 | 40 | 1 |
Ambarella, Inc. | 2.6B | 84 | 95 | 45 | 75 | 79 | 41 | 1 |
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 2.6B | 93 | 81 | 83 | 74 | 82 | 42 | 1 |
Rambus Inc. | 2.4B | 96 | 73 | 89 | 88 | 89 | 43 | 1 |
Canadian Solar Inc. | 2.0B | 69 | 70 | 74 | 66 | 71 | 44 | 1 |
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | 1.9B | 81 | 77 | 68 | 84 | 82 | 45 | 1 |
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 1.7B | 60 | 85 | 37 | 43 | 53 | 46 | 1 |
Himax Technologies, Inc. | 1.6B | 66 | 77 | 48 | 77 | 66 | 47 | 1 |
Impinj, Inc. | 1.4B | 70 | 38 | 85 | 73 | 65 | 48 | 1 |
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. | 1.4B | 68 | 41 | 41 | 76 | 61 | 49 | 1 |
Cohu, Inc. | 1.3B | 92 | 62 | 71 | 44 | 59 | 50 | 1 |
Photronics, Inc. | 1.2B | 65 | 92 | 96 | 79 | 82 | 51 | 1 |
SMART Global Holdings, Inc. | 1.0B | 48 | 85 | 95 | 53 | 62 | 52 | 1 |
Veeco Instruments Inc. | 1.0B | 74 | 82 | 48 | 69 | 71 | 53 | 1 |
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited | 929.5M | 49 | 64 | 45 | 60 | 54 | 54 | 1 |
PDF Solutions, Inc. | 808.6M | 81 | 98 | 45 | 92 | 89 | 55 | 1 |
CEVA, Inc. | 778.5M | 57 | 54 | 84 | 83 | 71 | 56 | 1 |
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. | 754.1M | 51 | 37 | 87 | 70 | 58 | 57 | 1 |
Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. | 575.9M | 87 | 90 | 59 | 88 | 84 | 58 | 1 |
Enphase Energy, Inc. | 25.7B | 89 | 77 | 64 | 41 | 60 | 59 | 1 |
Wolfspeed, Inc. | 8.2B | 57 | 74 | 76 | 46 | 55 | 60 | 1 |
Daqo New Energy Corp. | 5.0B | 78 | 86 | 63 | 96 | 89 | 61 | 1 |
SiTime Corporation | 3.6B | 83 | 87 | 56 | 44 | 62 | 62 | 1 |
Onto Innovation Inc. | 3.6B | 94 | 65 | 88 | 85 | 85 | 63 | 1 |
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. | 3.2B | 68 | 69 | 73 | 78 | 74 | 64 | 1 |
Camtek Ltd. | 1.1B | 69 | 70 | 74 | 72 | 71 | 65 | 1 |
ACM Research, Inc. | 917.6M | 61 | 43 | 50 | 54 | 50 | 66 | 1 |
NeoPhotonics Corporation | 838.5M | 50 | 63 | 67 | 87 | 71 | 67 | 1 |
Hanwha Q CELLS Co., Ltd. | 818.9M | 64 | 63 | 74 | 73 | 68 | 68 | 1 |
indie Semiconductor, Inc. | 720.1M | 69 | 80 | 52 | 98 | 85 | 69 | 1 |
Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation | 667.1M | 65 | 56 | 76 | 54 | 57 | 70 | 1 |
Mykrolis Corp. | 657.1M | 65 | 69 | 68 | 82 | 75 | 71 | 1 |
Navitas Semiconductor Corporation | 533.1M | 70 | 87 | 94 | 93 | 90 | 72 | 1 |
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. | 417.9M | 66 | 64 | 68 | 94 | 73 | 73 | 1 |
Rigetti Computing, Inc. | 413.5M | 48 | 76 | 51 | 60 | 58 | 74 | 1 |
Meta Materials Inc. | 396.9M | 85 | 56 | 68 | 97 | 84 | 75 | 1 |
Helix Technology Corporation | 364.9M | 75 | 62 | 63 | 56 | 61 | 76 | 1 |
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. | 357.2M | 53 | 89 | 90 | 47 | 66 | 77 | 1 |
Rockley Photonics Holdings Limited | 305.7M | 79 | 72 | 66 | 47 | 60 | 78 | 1 |
CyberOptics Corporation | 272.8M | 49 | 74 | 89 | 77 | 72 | 79 | 1 |
Transphorm, Inc. | 255.8M | 81 | 88 | 96 | 95 | 88 | 80 | 1 |
This report is intended for general guidance and information purposes only and under no circumstances is tailored to a specific factor or variable related to its reader or intended to be used or considered as financial or investment advice, a solicitation of any offer, a recommendation, or an offer to sell or buy any securities or other form of a financial asset. For the full disclaimer, click here.