Loading..

The below chart reflects Jupiter Mines's birds-eye view on its performance with respect to its peers, the company's fillings as reported or to a similar industry, market cap, and country of origin. While Jupiter Mines's peer average final assessment score stands on 68.0, Jupiter Mines's score is 64.

Balance Sheet Analysis

Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the balance sheet strength in Jupiter Miness recent report: Assets and Book Value Factors. Jupiter Mines assets on their balance sheet, moved to 532.7, which is a -4.2% change from the last period. These results, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 93. Also, Jupiter Mines publishes solid book value factor metrics in this report. Price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 1.0 and represents a -30.7% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 80. However, one concerning metric, Equity, stood out. Jupiter Mines published concerning equity metrics for this filing. In the current report, equity stood at 435.3, which represents a -5.2% change from the last report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.7%. This performance is significantly less impressive than its peers and competitors. Its equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 46. Therefore, we scored its balance sheet a 66.

The below chart describes Jupiter Mines's performance as reflected on its balance sheet with respect to its peers. While Jupiter Mines received a balance sheet score of 66, the average of its peers stands on 65.0.

Income Statement Analysis

Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the income statement's strength in Jupiter Mines's recent report: Revenue Efficiency and Return Factors. Jupiter Mines did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Jupiter Mines's revenue efficiency is 7.3 according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a -11.0% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 26.6%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 96. Also, Jupiter Mines's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 12.1, representing a change of -21.2%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 50. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Jupiter Mines's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 2.0, which represents a -54.1% change from the last period. This metric might have a 14.7 percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their EBITDA a grade of 46. As the companie's management is doing an excellent job managing the critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 81.

The below chart describes Jupiter Mines's performance as reflected on its income statement with respect to its peers. While Jupiter Mines received a income statement score of 81 , the average of its peers stands on 69.0.

Cash Flow Analysis

Jupiter Mines's recently published cash flow conveyed disappointing growth, particularly concerning Asset Turnover and Net Cash Flow metrics. Jupiter Mines's asset turnover metrics were concerning and highlighted potential issues management is having effectively turning assets into sales efficiently. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.0, representing a -12.0% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.8%. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Therefore, their asset turnover movement earned a score of 44. Also, Jupiter Mines's produced underwhelming cash flow numbers in this filing. Net cash flow was reported as -26.5, which is a -172.8% change from the last report. As demonstrated by these concerning net cash flow metrics, their priorities seem to be headed in the wrong direction. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 51. On the other hand, Capex, jumped out as looking rather positive. Jupiter Mines's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -0.0, which represents a 17.5% change from the last period. The company appears to be headed in the right direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its CapEx movement component earned a score of 84. Therefore, their cash flow earned a grade of 50.

The below chart describes Jupiter Mines's performance as reflected on its cash flow with respect to its peers. While Jupiter Mines received a cash flow score of 50, the average of its peers stands on 72.0.