Loading..

The below chart reflects Alumina's birds-eye view on its performance with respect to its peers, the company's fillings as reported or to a similar industry, market cap, and country of origin. While Alumina's peer average final assessment score stands on 70.0, Alumina's score is 70.

Balance Sheet Analysis

A few metrics from Alumina's current balance sheet were especially concerning: Cash & Equivalents and Equity. Alumina reported concerning cash and cash equivalents metrics in this filing. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 9.1, representing a -36.4% change from the last period. The company's cash and cash equivalents metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 46. Also, Alumina management produced disappointing equity metrics this period, which stood at 1685.6, representing a -3.2% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.9%. These metrics are all the more disappointing relative to their peers and should blunt potential positive momentum in its's stock price. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 50. That said, one metric, Book Value Factors, stood out as strongly positive. Alumina publishes solid book value factor metrics in this report. Price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 2.2 and represents a 8.6% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 84. Therefore, the company's balance sheet earned a grade of 50.

The below chart describes Alumina's performance as reflected on its balance sheet with respect to its peers. While Alumina received a balance sheet score of 50, the average of its peers stands on 69.0.

Income Statement Analysis

Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the income statement's strength in Alumina's recent report: Revenue Efficiency and Return Factors. Alumina reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 24.0%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 87. Also, Alumina's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 11.0, representing a change of 41.2%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 76. That said, one metric, EBITDA, stood out as strongly negative. Alumina's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as -14.9, which represents a 0.0% change from the last period. This metric might have a 20.0 percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Alumina appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 73. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 79.

The below chart describes Alumina's performance as reflected on its income statement with respect to its peers. While Alumina received a income statement score of 79 , the average of its peers stands on 69.0.

Cash Flow Analysis

Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the cash flow's strength in Alumina's recent report: Capex and Free Cash flow. Alumina's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Alumina recorded CapEx of -0.1, which represents 0.0% change from the previous report. This remarkable CapEx growth is expected to reinforce upward momentum for its's stock price going forward. Therefore, its CapEx movement component earned a score of 76. Also, Alumina did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 0.1, representing a 2.0% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 4.3%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 74. That said, one metric, Net Cash Flow, stood out as particularly concerning. Alumina's management was not successful in meaningfully improving their cash flow metrics. As of the current filing, they were reported as -1.3 and represented a 92.9% change from the previous period. As demonstrated by these concerning net cash flow metrics, their priorities seem to be headed in the wrong direction. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 68. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 72.

The below chart describes Alumina's performance as reflected on its cash flow with respect to its peers. While Alumina received a cash flow score of 72, the average of its peers stands on 68.0.