Coolpad Group Limited (CHWT.F) Report Analysis
At a high level, the metrics from Coolpad's Q2 financial report release were demonstrably negative. Their income and value factors performance indicate that company management is missing the critical targets and not executing well. These results indicate a weak income potential for Coolpad's stock's price moving forward. As such, Coolpad received an overall score of 58 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation.
Coolpad announced earnings results for the half year ended June 30, 2021. For the half year, the company announced sales was HKD 320.119 million compared to HKD 385.920 million a year ago. Net loss was HKD 238.134 million compared to HKD 65.927 million a year ago. Basic loss per share was HKD 0.0311 compared to HKD 0.0104 a year ago. Basic loss per share from continuing operations was 3.11 HK cents compared to 1.08 HK cents a year ago.
Business Description
Coolpad, an investment holding company, operates as a wireless solution and equipment provider in Mainland China and internationally. It operates through two segments: Mobile Phone and Property Investment. The Mobile Phone segment engages in the research, development, production, and sale of mobile phones and related accessories; and provision of wireless application services. The Property Investment segment invests in properties. It also offers product design and software development for mobile handsets; mobile phone maintenance services; and property management services. The company was formerly known as China Wireless Technologies Limited and changed its name to Coolpad in January 2014. Coolpad was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Shenzhen, China.
Sector Overview
Coolpad is included in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals according to GICS (global industry classification standard). The Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry is part of the Information Technology sector. It includes manufacturers of mobile phones, PCs, servers, electronic computer components and peripherals. Coolpad's industry and sector affiliation are expected to negatively affect their likelihood to overperform the market in the upcoming period, as other sectors appear more likely to benefit from the macroeconomic environment we see now.
Parameter | Value | Change | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Return on Equity | -34.8 | -282.7% | 63 | |
Net Cashflow | 767.4 | 134.2% | 59 | |
Capital Expenditure | -141.2 | 45.9% | 79 | |
Asset Turnover | 0.2 | -92.3% | 43 | |
Free Cashflow | -0.1 | 70.3% | 74 |
* All values are TTM
The below chart reflects Coolpad's birds-eye view on its performance with respect to its peers, the company's fillings as reported or to a similar industry, market cap, and country of origin. While Coolpad's peer average final assessment score stands on 67.0, Coolpad's score is 58.
When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Coolpad's stock is now priced below its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (moving average convergence divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a negative setup in the near, medium, and long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (relative strength index), Coolpad's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal negative momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (technical analysis) score of 47.
Coolpad's most recent balance sheet report was not encouraging. Coolpad's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 1.4 and represents -52.4% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 11.6%. Their book value factor metrics are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Disappointing results in book value factors typically precede negative pressure in stock prices, so its book value factors received a grade of 45. Also, Coolpad management produced disappointing equity metrics this period, which stood at 2275.2, representing a -28.0% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 4.0%. Their equity metrics appear unremarkable relative to their peers. Therefore, their equity movement component earned a score of 47. That said, one metric, Assets, stood out as strongly positive. Coolpad's management was effective in managing the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 5128.3 and represents a -62.3% change from the previous report. This performance is interesting in comparison to its peers and competitors. Therefore, its asset component earned a score of 86. The company's balance sheet, Therefore, earned a score of 53.
Parameter | Value | Change | Score |
---|---|---|---|
Assets | 5,128.3 | -62.3% | 86 |
Liabilities | 2,852.7 | -72.6% | 48 |
Price to Book | 1.4 | -52.4% | 45 |
Cash & Equivalents | 1,174.7 | -50.2% | 63 |
Equity | 2,275.2 | -28.0% | 47 |
The below chart describes Coolpad's performance as reflected on its balance sheet with respect to its peers. While Coolpad received a balance sheet score of 53, the average of its peers stands on 73.0.
Name | Market Cap | Liabilities Movement | Asset Change | Equity/Intangibles Adjustments | Cash & Equivalents | Book Value Momentum | Balance Sheet | mc_sort | Hidden |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apple Inc. | 2.3T | 50 | 80 | 60 | 46 | 56 | 53 | 0 | 1 |
Dell Technologies Inc. | 37.2B | 56 | 80 | 57 | 44 | 55 | 54 | 1 | 1 |
HP Inc. | 36.5B | 71 | 73 | 97 | 91 | 92 | 95 | 2 | 1 |
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 18.4B | 52 | 78 | 73 | 46 | 67 | 63 | 3 | 1 |
Seagate Technology Holdings plc | 15.9B | 60 | 80 | 58 | 46 | 52 | 56 | 4 | 1 |
Western Digital Corporation | 14.9B | 60 | 77 | 55 | 68 | 62 | 59 | 5 | 1 |
NetApp, Inc. | 14.9B | 78 | 67 | 60 | 67 | 52 | 62 | 6 | 1 |
Pure Storage, Inc. | 8.0B | 42 | 82 | 62 | 66 | 57 | 55 | 7 | 1 |
Xerox Holdings Corporation | 2.5B | 67 | 77 | 60 | 58 | 56 | 62 | 8 | 1 |
Super Micro Computer, Inc. | 2.2B | 89 | 62 | 93 | 70 | 90 | 93 | 9 | 1 |
Corsair Gaming, Inc. | 1.4B | 50 | 72 | 64 | 38 | 63 | 52 | 10 | 1 |
3D Systems Corporation | 1.3B | 57 | 80 | 46 | 38 | 45 | 45 | 11 | 1 |
Stratasys Ltd. | 1.3B | 58 | 81 | 47 | 88 | 54 | 57 | 12 | 1 |
Avid Technology, Inc. | 1.2B | 52 | 82 | 43 | 45 | 59 | 49 | 13 | 1 |
IonQ, Inc. | 957.0M | 38 | 74 | 53 | 37 | 49 | 37 | 14 | 1 |
Nano Dimension Ltd. | 834.0M | 96 | 85 | 59 | 48 | 60 | 82 | 15 | 1 |
Canaan Inc. | 600.4M | 76 | 62 | 88 | 67 | 83 | 81 | 16 | 1 |
CompoSecure, Inc. | 441.4M | 58 | 64 | 66 | 44 | 82 | 59 | 17 | 1 |
Eastman Kodak Company | 419.9M | 67 | 70 | 55 | 53 | 66 | 58 | 18 | 1 |
Turtle Beach Corporation | 227.4M | 39 | 80 | 69 | 86 | 67 | 67 | 19 | 1 |
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated | 190.3M | 65 | 83 | 43 | 40 | 56 | 54 | 20 | 1 |
Overall, Coolpad's critical income statement metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Coolpad reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 12.1%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 98. Also, Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Coolpad reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of -34.8, representing a change of -282.7% from the last report. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 63. That said, one metric, EBITDA, stood out as strongly negative. Coolpad's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as -468.6, which represents a -193.6% change from the last period. This metric might have a 8.1 percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 58. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 80.
Parameter | Value | Change | Score |
---|---|---|---|
EBITDA | -468.6 | -193.6% | 58 |
Total Revenues | 746.0 | -97.0% | 98 |
Return on Equity | -34.8 | -282.7% | 63 |
The below chart describes Coolpad's performance as reflected on its income statement with respect to its peers. While Coolpad received a income statement score of 80 , the average of its peers stands on 60.0.
Name | Market Cap | Revenue Momentum | Earning Movement | Return Factors Momentum | Income Statement | mc_sort | Hidden |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apple Inc. | 2.3T | 76 | 67 | 79 | 74 | 0 | 1 |
Dell Technologies Inc. | 37.2B | 68 | 65 | 82 | 69 | 1 | 1 |
HP Inc. | 36.5B | 81 | 61 | 64 | 73 | 2 | 1 |
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 18.4B | 85 | 56 | 61 | 73 | 3 | 1 |
Seagate Technology Holdings plc | 15.9B | 83 | 69 | 90 | 79 | 4 | 1 |
Western Digital Corporation | 14.9B | 80 | 83 | 71 | 82 | 5 | 1 |
NetApp, Inc. | 14.9B | 76 | 63 | 52 | 70 | 6 | 1 |
Pure Storage, Inc. | 8.0B | 46 | 97 | 96 | 71 | 7 | 1 |
Xerox Holdings Corporation | 2.5B | 88 | 46 | 45 | 69 | 8 | 1 |
Super Micro Computer, Inc. | 2.2B | 43 | 95 | 95 | 69 | 9 | 1 |
Corsair Gaming, Inc. | 1.4B | 97 | 41 | 39 | 71 | 10 | 1 |
3D Systems Corporation | 1.3B | 91 | 38 | 42 | 67 | 11 | 1 |
Stratasys Ltd. | 1.3B | 61 | 48 | 81 | 58 | 12 | 1 |
Avid Technology, Inc. | 1.2B | 79 | 68 | 69 | 75 | 13 | 1 |
IonQ, Inc. | 957.0M | 37 | 47 | 61 | 43 | 14 | 1 |
Nano Dimension Ltd. | 834.0M | 37 | 46 | 73 | 45 | 15 | 1 |
Canaan Inc. | 600.4M | 38 | 93 | 77 | 64 | 16 | 1 |
CompoSecure, Inc. | 441.4M | 51 | 69 | 53 | 58 | 17 | 1 |
Eastman Kodak Company | 419.9M | 75 | 61 | 49 | 68 | 18 | 1 |
Turtle Beach Corporation | 227.4M | 96 | 41 | 42 | 69 | 19 | 1 |
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated | 190.3M | 92 | 42 | 73 | 72 | 20 | 1 |
Coolpad's recently published cash flow conveyed disappointing growth, particularly concerning Asset Turnover and Net Cash Flow metrics. Coolpad's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. Coolpad recorded asset turnover of 0.2, which represents a -92.3% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 10.4 percent by this parameter. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 43. Also, Coolpad's net cash flow metrics were 767.4 according to their current filing, which represents a 134.2% change from the previous report. Their net cash flow momentum should be a cause for concern and could bring negative momentum for Coolpad's stock price going forward. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 59. However, one encouraging metric, Capex, stood out. Coolpad's management was effective in improving its CapEx, which now sits at -141.2 and represents 45.9% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 79. Its cash flow, therefore, earned a score of 58.
Parameter | Value | Change | Score |
---|---|---|---|
Net Cashflow | 767.4 | 134.2% | 59 |
Capital Expenditure | -141.2 | 45.9% | 79 |
Asset Turnover | 0.2 | -92.3% | 43 |
Free Cashflow | -0.1 | 70.3% | 74 |
The below chart describes Coolpad's performance as reflected on its cash flow with respect to its peers. While Coolpad received a cash flow score of 58, the average of its peers stands on 68.0.
Name | Market Cap | Cashflow Momentum | Free Cashflow Growth | Capital Expenditure Growth | Assets Factors Momentum | Cash Flow | mc_sort | Hidden |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apple Inc. | 2.3T | 76 | 75 | 68 | 91 | 84 | 0 | 1 |
Dell Technologies Inc. | 37.2B | 68 | 50 | 68 | 85 | 72 | 1 | 1 |
HP Inc. | 36.5B | 56 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 57 | 2 | 1 |
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 18.4B | 77 | 52 | 62 | 71 | 66 | 3 | 1 |
Seagate Technology Holdings plc | 15.9B | 64 | 77 | 76 | 79 | 76 | 4 | 1 |
Western Digital Corporation | 14.9B | 65 | 82 | 54 | 70 | 70 | 5 | 1 |
NetApp, Inc. | 14.9B | 77 | 58 | 37 | 53 | 55 | 6 | 1 |
Pure Storage, Inc. | 8.0B | 94 | 91 | 64 | 97 | 95 | 7 | 1 |
Xerox Holdings Corporation | 2.5B | 59 | 64 | 77 | 75 | 69 | 8 | 1 |
Super Micro Computer, Inc. | 2.2B | 51 | 51 | 90 | 68 | 62 | 9 | 1 |
Corsair Gaming, Inc. | 1.4B | 50 | 37 | 48 | 46 | 40 | 10 | 1 |
3D Systems Corporation | 1.3B | 58 | 40 | 61 | 65 | 55 | 11 | 1 |
Stratasys Ltd. | 1.3B | 83 | 37 | 77 | 51 | 55 | 12 | 1 |
Avid Technology, Inc. | 1.2B | 58 | 59 | 45 | 94 | 74 | 13 | 1 |
IonQ, Inc. | 957.0M | 69 | 66 | 54 | 98 | 82 | 14 | 1 |
Nano Dimension Ltd. | 834.0M | 69 | 70 | 74 | 55 | 70 | 15 | 1 |
Canaan Inc. | 600.4M | 67 | 69 | 73 | 46 | 57 | 16 | 1 |
CompoSecure, Inc. | 441.4M | 77 | 76 | 46 | 48 | 58 | 17 | 1 |
Eastman Kodak Company | 419.9M | 84 | 50 | 50 | 54 | 57 | 18 | 1 |
Turtle Beach Corporation | 227.4M | 87 | 38 | 87 | 51 | 60 | 19 | 1 |
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated | 190.3M | 38 | 38 | 59 | 72 | 53 | 20 | 1 |
This report is intended for general guidance and information purposes only and under no circumstances is tailored to a specific factor or variable related to its reader or intended to be used or considered as financial or investment advice, a solicitation of any offer, a recommendation, or an offer to sell or buy any securities or other form of a financial asset. For the full disclaimer, click here.